David Ernst chats with the World

Friday, 2007-11-30

Who’s your candidate?

Filed under: pass alongs — David @ 12:55 am

One organization’s interview to find out who you should vote for…

These things are always fun, right? And especially when we’ve got this many candidates they can actually be useful, because we don’t always know that much about the different candidates.

According to the quiz, I should be excited about Chris Dodd, who I must admit I know practically nothing about (but, I live in Indiana, where primaries don’t matter, so why should I expect to know anything about him? (Are we all sick of the Primary status quo, or is it just me (and my parents)?)). Barack and Hillary tie for second place, with Joe Biden close behind them. Fascinating. Regardless of any libertarian leanings I may have, I found it interesting that all of the Democrats ranked higher for me than all of the Republicans. And all of this is perhaps especially interesting considering that I wasn’t at all confident about my answers on this survey. To take the most simple example, I had a terrible time answering the Iraq question. None of the choices were anything like “Well, I felt strongly that we shouldn’t have gotten into this mess, but now that we’re 4.5 years into the mess, I don’t know how the hell to get us out of it. But it sure is a terrible mess!”

Anyway, I’d be very interested to hear anyone else’s results, if you care to take the time (2-3 minutes).

Comments (6)

Tuesday, 2007-11-13

Filed under: journalism — David @ 12:41 am

I heard Robert Kuttner interviewed on Fresh Air today, promoting his new book The Squandering of America. Just hearing the title already had me incredulous, and now I’m thinking it’s finally time that I follow suit to Kynthia’s outing of herself and myself as being more libertarian than most of our close friends, and perhaps more Libertarian than Democrat.

That’s a huge topic, though, so I’ll focus on just this interview. Um, America has not been squandered. I suppose Mr. Kuttner thinks it is in the process of being squandered, and I certainly welcome the presentation of his case. But, it’s amazing to me that he presents this case as if it were stating the obvious, rather than an extraordinary claim.

Actually, in the remarkably long excerpt from the book that’s on the Fresh Air page, he talks about squandered standing in the world because of the Bush administration’s dreadful foreign policy, and the squandering of our environment. There are strong cases to be made in these areas, and I (and many libertarians (I’m being very intentional about my capitalization here, by the way)) likely agree with many of his points in these areas. But, as he says, that’s not what his book is about:

“To write about all the ways in which the promise of America is being squandered would require more than one book. This book is about one large dimension: the connection between a precarious economy and a diminished politics.”

Just how precarious is the economy? Well, of course, we’ll only know if/when it collapses. Of course, we’d have to agree that it had collapsed (even Kuttner said in the interview that there wasn’t going to be another great depression, but he did have the courage (sarcasm intended) to predict that we would have a recession sometime soon). And even then, we’ll speculate about why it collapsed. So, it’s really hard to say just how precarious it is.

But, of course, the thing all the lefties are citing right now as why free markets are patently bad is the “subprime mortgage crisis.” Perhaps there is a crisis going on, but I really disagree with the way people like Kuttner and Gretchen Morgenson (also recently interviewed on Fresh Air about the “subprime mortgage crisis”) characterize it. Here’s my take:

Interest rates (2002-2005ish) were low
Some financial hotshots started experimenting with new ways to lend people money
They went looking for people to lend money to
Countless middle-to-upper-class people already had mortgages they liked, so they turned to people of lower income and poorer credit ratings (hence “subprime”)
A few years later the adjustable rate mortgages are adjusting way up, and the lower-income borrowers can’t afford their mortgage payments anymore. So, there are record numbers of foreclosures.

I suspect that just about everyone agrees with that characterization of things. So, who are the victims of this crisis? The obvious sympathy would go to the borrowers who are facing foreclosure. While my heart definitely goes out to them, these are people who, almost by definition, had no hope of getting a home loan before this bubble. So, it will be difficult for them, and I do not mean to belittle their situation. But in the end, they will end up renting, just like they were before.

This is a good time to distinguish here a related but different practice, the one commonly called predatory lending. To the degree that borrowers were defrauded by people using criminal or unethically misleading methods, they are extremely worthy of protection under the law. Free markets depend on the rule of law, and any libertarian will tell you that fraud should be considered an extremely serious crime.

But, I don’t think that predatory lending accounts for the majority of this “crisis”. I don’t even think it’s that big a chunk. Most of these borrowers were riding a wave of excitement that they might be able to own a home, and the lenders were doing all of their legal and ethical disclosures trying to find potential sources of revenue.

The victims of this crisis are the lenders. But, unlike so many cases, blaming the victim here is entirely appropriate. These companies knew they were dealing with subprime borrowers… how could they forget? The entire practice was known as “subprime lending”. And they did it. A LOT! They literally bet billions of dollars on people they wouldn’t have lent money to just a few years earlier. And, a substantial number of those bets are failing. And, they’re losing money, executives are getting fired, they’re scrambling to keep things running, banks are pooling funds to prepare themselves to bail each other out if necessary. Definitely sounds like a crisis. But my heart does not go out to them. They are reaping their rotten harvest. The fact that none of them are going to end up hungry or homeless does not, of course, make me feel any more pity.

Now, people like Kuttner and Morgenson look at all this and say “you see? if we had more regulation we could prevent crises like this!” They are probably right. But this is where a free-market type says that the market is correcting itself. The people who made bad bets are the ones in crisis.

It’s interesting to compare this all with the other recent “bubble”, which was of course the “dot com bubble”. Morgenson referenced this while she was criticizing Alan Greenspan saying that he “never met a bubble he didn’t like”. Brother. Obviously he didn’t LIKE them (does “irrational exuberance” sound like praise to you?), he just believed that the proper solution was to let the people making bad bets lose. Kuttner and Morgenson would clearly prefer that the bad bets not be placed in the first place. The question in my mind is, which is better: a society where you can make whatever bet you want, but you have to pay for your bad bets; or a society where the government limits the bets you can make?

Who were the “victims” of the Dot Com crash? Mostly people who had invested heavily in dot coms. And actually, it was mostly people who invested heavily late in the game. A friend once joked that if he had a time machine he might tell people not to buy tech stocks during the craze. I said “Are you crazy? The correct message is “sell your tech stocks before March of 2000!” If you bought a NASDAQ index fund on January 1 1999 and sold a year later, you would have made very roughly 100% annual return. But if you bought on January 1 2000 and sold a year later, you’d be very disappointed. By the beginning of 2000, everyone knew this was a bubble. That was a high risk, and people who made it might have lost a lot. Meanwhile, after countless companies folded and a terrorist attack that destroyed one of the most important financial centers in the world, the US experienced a mild recession. Sure, a lot of dot com millionaires were no longer millionaires, but this was not a broad crisis. Indeed, service industries boomed during this period, I suspect many of the lowest-wage workers felt the boom but the bust not nearly so much.

So, coming back to the present, the housing bubble is bursting. Yes, some low-income people are losing their homes, and this is definitely sad. But, they didn’t die, they have some major cleaning up to do, and hopefully they’ll be back to try again someday soon. Meanwhile — and I can’t believe no one talks about this — a substantial number of these subprime loans are not going to fail. That means that a huge number of people who in the 1990s would have been entirely unable to get a home loan will be home owners for the rest of their lives. They should be careful about their mortgage, they should work on negotiating with their lender if they are in trouble (banks hate foreclosing, I believe the financial advisors I’m hearing that are encouraging people to call their lenders and work on restructuring their loans if they are in trouble). Those who succeed should proudly enjoy the home that they have earned the right to call their own. Meanwhile, many of us in the middle class are paying unbelievably low interest rates on our mortgages, locked in when rates were so low. And of course, most of our houses are worth much much more today than when we bought, even in cases where the price has dropped a bit recently.

According to the census bureau, (and this graph in wikipedia) in 1970 the home-ownership rate in the US was just over 64%. From 1985-1994, it was never more than half a percentage point away from 64%. The most recent reported number is 68.2%. That’s down from a year ago, and I bet it will fall more from here. But, I bet it will not be down below 64% again for a long long time. So, amazingly (sarcasm again intended) home ownership will have increased substantially during this “crisis”.

In short, the people who made good bets are doing well. The people who made bad bets are suffering. The left in America reads this as a reason to regulate this process. The free-marketeers are saying “well, the moral of the story is: make good bets, stay away from bad ones.” As to which way things work better, we’ll never know for sure. But I’m with the free-marketeers.

Comments (2)

Friday, 2007-11-09

Automated Phone Call From The Cops

Filed under: journalism — David @ 12:08 am

Wow, is this the new thing? Yes, I guess it is, the thing they call reverse 911. Now I get it.

10:55pm: the phone rings. I figured only a close friend would call so late, I answer:

“This is the Bloomington Police Department”

WOAH! Well, they weren’t after me for any reason, it was a recorded voice, saying they wanted help finding some dangerous man on the loose. I remember some of the description, but I can’t give his name or anything (that was part of the recording). And, worse, I figured there’d be some website you could go to to, say, check the facts again, maybe see a mug shot… Well, if there is, I can’t find it. Seems pretty lame.

Does seem like something is afoot though. I found these two newsy clips about IU police having acquired such a system. I swear this said Bloomington Police, though, and I don’t know why IU police would call out here. On the other hand, the place they said this guy was last sighted was nowhere near my house, so… who knows.

Anyway, a sign of the time, my first reverse 911 call. I wonder how long before I feel ashamed that I didn’t know what it was. :)

Comments (2)

Tuesday, 2007-11-06

Uninspiring voting day II: return of the yawn!

Filed under: reviews — David @ 12:10 pm

Well, I had to follow up from my post back in May about the very uninteresting primary ballot. Well, today was the general election, and … well, like most sequels, it wasn’t as impressive as the original, but definitely a variation on the same theme.

In May there were literally no contested elections on my ballot. On today’s ballot, there were two decisions to make: A normal race for mayor, and a “pick three out of four” for the three At Large City Council seats. I was the only voter there the whole time I was there, which admittedly wasn’t very long. I remain disappointed by the non-printing electronic voting machine.

yawn At least the first time was fresh and new. Even if this vote wasn’t quite as boring, it was less impressively boring, so in some sense, even more boring.

Comments (2)

LIPITOR INSURANCE

ALLERGIC TO MOTRIN

RELPAX MIGRAINE ELETRIPTAN

PREVACID DOSAGE FOR CHILDREN

PLAVIX PATENT EXPIR

PAXIL SIDE EFFECT PROFILE

GENERIC VIAGRA ONLINE PHARMACIES

ZERIT SIDE EFFECTS

CAPECITABINE TREATMENT

HUMULIN N PEAK ACTION TIME

ADIPEX ORDERING

CLARITIN HEALTH ALTERNATIVE

NCCU BRITE ADDRESS

NOVO GLYBURIDE SIDE EFFECTS

PRAVACHOL AND RASH

HGH SUPPLMENT

CAN YOU TAKE CYMBALTA WITH SYNTHROID

SURGERY BREAST AUGMENTATION RESULTS

COREG STOCK

TRIPHALA BIDY POWDER

WHEN WAS PREVACID PATENTED

ACEON ONLINE

SEPTRA DOSAGE FOR CHILDREN

QUITING ULTRAM

OMBRELLE KIDS SPF 45

PRAVACHOL OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

CHEAP BUTALBITAL

EFFEXOR FOOD INTERACTION

CIPROXINA XR 500

MELATONIN AND HEADACHES

PRILOSEC OVERDOSE

WHAT IS AVAPRO 150MG

NATURAL ARIMIDEX ALTERNATIVES

PERSONAL LUBRICANT PLUS VIAGRA

ALBUTEROL VENTOLIN BUY

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PHARMACY

IOVATE HOODIA SURE RAPID GELS REVIEW

SYNTHROID AND CALCIUM

SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS OF DILANTIN

NOLVADEX DOSAGE FOR BODYBUILDER

DOES LOPRESSOR CAUSE AN ENLAGED HEART

DIET PILLS CONTAINING MA HUANG HOODIA

MONTELUKAST SINGULAIR

CAT ON PROZAC

GABAPENTIN 300MG DOSES

CELEXA DRUGS

PREDNISONE DRY EYES TIREDNESS

SIDE EFFECTS OF CRESTOR MEDICINE

ASSOCIATION NATIONAL PHARMACY TECHNICIAN

WHAT IS COUMADIN USED FOR

PREDNISONE ANTIBIOTIC

SIDE EFFECTS OF SNORTING ADDERALL XR

LEGAL US ONLINE PHARMACIES

SIDE EFFECTS ALLEGRA WELBUTRIN

TENORMIN ORDER

IS LIPITOR BAD

ELMIRON MEDICINE

PREDNISONE 10MG DOSEPACK 48CT

WHITE BRITE TOOTH WHITENING

HOW TO BUY PERCOCET ONLINE WITHOUT RX

BENZAC WASH AC

NEWSWEEK SIDE EFFECTS OF LIPITOR

CIPRO ANGIOEDEMA

LAMISIL CLINICAL TRIALS

LEXAPRO WIKIPEDIA

ALLEGRA BUSINESS CARD VANCOUVER

DITROPAN ONLINE

TARKA THE OTTER GRAMMAR TEST

ARIMIDEX

ZOLOFT EXPERIENCES

GROWTH HORMONE HUMAN PILL

MAN ROGAINE

MOBIC DOGS

PICTURES OF ALLEGRA PILLS

LADOGAL DANAZOL CAPSULES

VENTOLIN DOSE COUNTER

PULMICORT FLEX INHALER

ONLINE CARISOPRODOL PRESCRIPTIONS

STAR BRITE RIDING ACADAMY RAY ARISS

I HATE THIS CLAS